1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. US Politics

US Politics Blog

From Kathy Gill, Former About.com Guide to US Politics

Strange Environmental Bedfellows

Monday March 10, 2008
Scientists report that greenhouse gas emissions must be drastically lowered "as early as mid-century in order to prevent warming that could change precipitation patterns and dry up sources of water worldwide."

Concurrently, CNN reports that 46 leaders of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) have "criticized their denomination in a statement Monday for being 'too timid' in confronting global warming." The SBC represents 16 million Americans and is the largest Protestant denomination in the country.

Any reduction in greenhouse gases or carbon footprint will require political action. To date, in the US most political action has occurred at the state and local level, not federal. More from the Washington Post:

For now, at least, a goal of zero emissions appears well beyond the reach of politicians here and abroad. U.S. leaders are just beginning to grapple with setting any mandatory limit on greenhouse gases. The Senate is poised to vote in June on legislation that would reduce U.S. emissions by 70 percent by 2050; the two Democratic senators running for president, Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) and Barack Obama (Ill.), back an 80 percent cut. The Republican presidential nominee, Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), supports a 60 percent reduction by mid-century.

Related:
Global Warming - Causes, Effects and Solutions
U.S. Climate Action Partnership: A Coalition for Change
Kyoto Protocol: Overview: Environmental Issue
Britain Says Climate Change Real, Cause For Prompt Action
Climate Change, Katrina and Muzzled Scientists

Comments

March 11, 2008 at 12:47 am
(1) FredSchmidlap says:

And they’re in league with these guys, too: http://tinyurl.com/25bl9l

March 11, 2008 at 2:37 pm
(2) Chuck Manson says:

So, is that 46 out of 50 leaders, or 46 out of 20,000? Kind of makes a difference doesn’t it?

And, although there are some scientists who have bought into the GW hysteria, there are other scientists who believe it’s junk science. How about reporting on John Coleman’s views of this liberal religion? He’s only the creator of the Weather Channel.

C

March 12, 2008 at 9:15 am
(3) Alphast says:

Hi everyone,

As far as I know, Global Warming human cause theory is challenged by a relatively small minority of scientists, mainly in the USA, which makes their objectivity questionable. Global warming itself is not really challenged at all, as it is a measured phenomenon, and widely documented. By the way, global warming human cause theory is not only a “liberal” idea. Many Republicans agree it is an issue too.

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Explore US Politics

About.com Special Features

Holiday Central

What to eat, where to go, fun things to do and how to save money on the perfect gifts. More >

Weird Breaking News

A daily look at some of the oddest (and dumbest) crimes around. More >

  1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. US Politics

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.