| You are here: | About>News & Issues>US Politics |
![]() | US Politics |
Kathy's US Politics BlogPentagon FOIA Request Required Court OrderAccording to David Barstow, who wrote Sunday's story about Pentagon propaganda, the story was two years in the making because the Pentagon ignored Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests (tip):
This article would have come sooner, but it took us two years to wrestle 8,000 pages of documents out of the Defense Department ... the Defense Department refused to produce many categories of documents in response to our requests under the federal Freedom of Information Act. We ultimately sued in federal court, yet even then the Pentagon failed to meet several court-ordered deadlines for producing documents. Last week, the judge overseeing our lawsuit threatened the Defense Department with sanctions if it continues to defy his deadlines for producing additional records. This is only one instance of the Bush Administration's abuse of FOIA. FOIA, which turned 40 last year, "came of age" during the Watergate era and gives citizens access to federal government documents. The Bush Administration has been notorious in both dragging its collective feet in response to FOIA requests and increasing secrecy (making documents inaccessible). "In October 2001, then-Attorney General John Ashcroft revoked former Attorney General Janet Reno's 1993 Freedom of Information directive, which encouraged agencies to make 'discretionary disclosures' of information whenever possible." More from a 2007 report from OpenTheGovernment.org:
In May 2006, the Bush Administration took the unprecedented step of declaring White House visitor logs "presidential records" instead of agency records. Right now, the Administration is challenging a court order -- initiated by a Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics (CREW) FOIA request -- to release visitor logs. The DOJ lawyers insist that the President has a "right to privacy" that would be infringed upon if the visitor logs were made public. Rather than balancing the president's interest with the public's, [U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Judge David S. Tatel] said, the government was simply disregarding the Freedom of Information Act. He said the policy would allow the president to "draw a curtain around the White House." But that's not all. In 2005, the Department of Justice for demanded almost $400,000 in advance in response to a FOI request relating to proceedings against immigrants immediately after the 9.11 attacks. The 21st century has not been a poster child for transparency in government. Related: Tuesday April 22, 2008 | comments (0) Display Latest Headlines | powered by WordPress |
|
All Topics | Email Article | | | ![]() |
| Advertising Info | News & Events | Work at About | SiteMap | Reprints | Help | Our Story | Be a Guide |
| User Agreement | Ethics Policy | Patent Info. | Privacy Policy | ©2008 About, Inc., A part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved. |


