1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. US Politics

US Politics Blog

From Kathy Gill, Former About.com Guide to US Politics

Iraq Reconstruction Audit Details Contract Failures

Monday April 28, 2008

On Sunday, the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) reported that contracts have been marked "complete" even when they were stopped prior to completion and that many "were ended specifically because of the contractors' actual or anticipated poor performance." The cost to date? More than $107 billion.

AP reports that SIGIR investigators "were also looking into whether contractors whose projects were terminated by the U.S. government due to inadequate performance might have been awarded new contracts later despite their poor records." A noble cause, that one, although it's doubtful any audit will actually result in changed practice:

Last year, congressional investigators said as much as $10 billion - or one in six dollars - charged by U.S. contractors for Iraq reconstruction were questionable or unsupported, and warned that significantly more taxpayer money was at risk.

For those who may have forgotten, the SIGIR was almost scuttled in 2006: a Republican Congress acting at the request of a Republican President. Termination was quietly overturned after the 2006 election.

The SIGIR makes regular reports to Congress on how Iraq reconstruction funds are spent and is the successor to the Coalition Provisional Authority Office of Inspector General (CPA-IG). SIGIR was created in October 2004 by a congressional amendment to Public Law 108-106 (55KB PDF), triggered by the June 28, 2004 dissolution of the CPA.

Related:
Conditions In Iraq
Iraq Timelne: Bush Strategies
US Sent $4 - Or Was It 12? - Billion In Cash To Iraq
Iraq War Statistics

Comments

April 28, 2008 at 6:00 am
(1) Alphast says:

Hi Kathy,

It might not have been a war for oil, after all. It was a slightly more sophisticated scheme. I believe that some high ranking Republicans in the Bush Administration (and probably G.W. himself or his family) had big money invested in the companies involved. It may have been simply a war for money. Greed is one of the most basic reasons for men’s acts.

After all, ex-Halliburton (who was by far the main contractor in Iraq) had several of its shareholders or ex-employees in the US administration. Carlyle Group, who builds various combat vehicle for the US Army and Marine Corps also has some well known shareholders. This same Group also owns logistics companies involved in the juicy supply transportation contracts to support the “coalition” troops in the Middle East.

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Explore US Politics

About.com Special Features

Holiday Central

What to eat, where to go, fun things to do and how to save money on the perfect gifts. More >

Weird Breaking News

A daily look at some of the oddest (and dumbest) crimes around. More >

  1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. US Politics

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.