US Politics

  1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. US Politics

US Politics Blog

From About.com

Earmarks That Slip Through The Cracks

Sunday October 12, 2008
Only five US Senators declined the opportunity to lard up the 2008 Defense bill with $8 billion in earmarks: Sen. Thomas Coburn (R-OK); Sen. James DeMint (R-SC); Sen. Russell Feingold (D-WI); Sen. John McCain (R-AZ); and Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO).

In The Favor Factory, the Seattle Times outlines in disturbing detail earmarks worth $3.5 billion that were hidden, tucked away, in the 2008 defense bill. Another $4.5 billion were "declared." The researchers report:

The hidden earmarks range from $8 million for lighting sold by a financially troubled company in North Carolina to $588 million for a submarine the administration doesn't want.

To be clear, the Seattle Times reporters are including spending requests that might not be technically called an "earmark" because they are not clearly identified with one specific Senator or Representative. However, they do meet another characteristic of an budget earmark: they apply to a very limited number of individuals or entities. And in many cases, back in the home district or state, the Congressman took credit for bring home the bacon, so to speak.

I'll be writing more about this series. For now, we should recognize the 58 Congressmen (including the five Senators) who had no earmarks in the 2008 bill. Also, see What Is An Earmark

Comments

October 16, 2008 at 9:03 am
(1) Roland James says:

Third debate and another rehash by McCain
on earmarks. No follow-ups to bring out the fact that Az and Ak are “recipient” states re total federal spending per capita and that Il and De are 2 of ~16 “donor” states (both about $1500 more federal taxes paid per capita than total federal spending in Il and De), according to www.taxfoundation.org for the latest year data is available, 2005.

Arizona has had a number of federal water projects and defense bases that lead Az to now receive about $1400 per capita more than
Az pays per capita in federal taxes.
Alaska is the largest per capita state at the federal $ trough–~$8500 “net” per capita of federal spending in Ak over federal taxes paid per capita, despite huge state oil and gas tax revenue.
McCain and Palin can rhetorically make a big deal about their rugged western independence, but it seems that Az and Ak and a majority of other “red” states often have their hands out for more money from Washington. McCain can refuse earmarks for Az because other congressmen from Az have done more than their fair share. When LBJ was Senate Majority Leader, he used to say about Sen. Carl Hayden: Here comes that old man from Az with a bucket and he wants me to fill it up for him.

February 1, 2009 at 1:32 pm
(2) kookimebux says:

Hello. And Bye. :)

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Explore US Politics

About.com Special Features

What is a Recession?

Sure, we're all talking about it, but what, exactly, defines a recession? More >

Weird Breaking News

A daily look at some of the oddest (and dumbest) crimes around. More >

US Politics

  1. Home
  2. News & Issues
  3. US Politics

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.