|
| State | Vendors | Status |
|---|
| AL |
DRE ($6,035 pm) and
Optical Scan (Danaher Controls, ES&S)
|
(cite1,
cite2,
cite3)
|
| AK |
|
Paper trail required. (cite) |
| AR |
DRE s (ES&S, MicroVote) and
Optical Scan (ES&S) |
Paper trial required. (cite1,
cite2,
cite3) |
| AZ |
DRE (Sequoia - est $7500 pm) and
Optical Scan (Diebold; Automark - $3500 pm) |
No paper trail (retrofit ~$1,000/machine). Allegations of vote errors (2004).
(cite1,
cite2) |
| CA |
DRE (Advanced Voting Systems, Avante, Diebold, ES&S, Hart Intercivic, Sequoia, Unilect) and
Optical Scan (Advanced Voting Systems, DFM Associates, Diebold, ES&S, Hart Intercivic) |
Audit of sample votes each election cycle.
Paper trail required.
Allegations of vote errors (CA-2004). (cite1,
cite2,
cite3,
cite4,
cite5)
|
| CO |
DRE (ES&S, Sequoia) and
Optical Scan (Diebold, ES&S) |
Paper trail required. (cite1,
cite2,
cite3) |
| CT |
No vendors yet approved. |
Paper trail required. (cite1, cite2,
cite3,
cite4) |
| DE |
DRE (Danaher Controls) - first state to use DREs |
(cite) |
| FL |
DRE (ES&S, Sequoia)
and
Optical Scan (Diebold)
|
(cite) |
| GA |
DRE (Diebold - all counties) - first state to use DREs in every county |
Mandate for $35 state-issued ID card blocked (cite) |
| HI |
Hart InterCivic |
Paper trail required. (cite1,
cite2,
cite3) |
| ID |
Optical Scan (ES&S) |
Paper trail required, but electronic record used in recount. (cite1,
cite2,
cite3) |
| IL |
Optical Scan (Diebold)
|
Paper trail required. (cite1,
cite2) |
| IN |
DRE (Diebold, ES&S (est $5,000 pm), Fidlar Doubleday, Hart InterCivic, VTI) and
Optical Scan (Diebold, ES&S, Fidlar Doubleday) |
(cite1,
cite2,
cite3) |
| IA |
DRE (Diebold, ES&S, Fidlar Doubleday, MicroVote, Sequoia)
and
Optical Scan (ES&S)
|
(cite1,
cite2) |
| KS |
Touch Scrren (Diebold) and
Optical Scan (Diebold, ES&S) |
No paper trail. (cite1,
cite2) |
| KY |
DRE (Danaher Controls)
and
Optical Scan (Diebold)
|
Audit of sample votes each election cycle. (cite1,
cite2) |
| LA |
DRE (ES&S, Sequoia)
|
(cite) |
| MA |
DRE
and
Optical Scan (Diebold, ES&S, Optech)
|
(cite1,
cite2) |
| MD |
DRE (Diebold, Sequoia) |
(cite1,
cite2) |
| ME |
Optical Scan (Diebold, ES&S) |
Paper trail required. (cite1,
cite2) |
| MI |
DRE (Diebold, ES&S, MicroVote, Sequoia, Unilect)
and
Optical Scan (Diebold, ES&S)
|
(cite) |
| MN |
Optical Scan (ES&S)
|
Paper trail required. (cite1,
cite2,
cite3)
|
| MO |
Optical Scan (Diebold)
|
Paper trail required on new machines. (cite1,
cite2) |
| MS |
DRE ($5,360 pm) and
Optical Scan (Diebold) |
(cite) |
| MT |
Optical Scan (ES&S) |
Paper trail required. (cite1,
cite2) |
| NC |
DRE (ES&S - Diebold certification challenged in court - MicroVote decertified) and
Optical Screen (ES&S) |
Paper trail required. (cite1, cite2, cite3,
cite3,
cite4)
|
| ND |
DRE (ES&S) and
Optical Scan (ES&S) |
(cite) |
| NE |
Optical Scan |
(cite) |
| NJ |
DRE (ES&S, Reliable, Sequoia)
and
Optical Scan () |
Paper trail required. (cite1,
cite2) |
| NH |
Optical Scan (Diebold, ES&S)
|
(cite) |
| NM |
DRE (Danaher Controls, Sequoia) and
Optical Scan (ES&S) |
Paper trail required. (cite,
cite2,
cite3)
|
| NV |
DRE (Sequoia) |
Paper trail required, but electronic record used in recount. (cite1,
cite2) |
| NY |
No vendors certified - draft regulations,
pdf. |
Paper trail required.
Audit of sample votes each election cycle. (cite1, cite2, cite3,
cite4,
cite5)
|
| OH |
DRE (ES&S, MicroVote)
and
Optical Scan (ES&S)
|
Paper trail required. (cite1,
cite2) |
| OK |
Optical Scan (ES&S) |
(cite) |
| OR |
Optical Scan (Central Count) |
All-mail voting.
(cite) |
| PA |
DRE (Advanced, ES&S and Accupoll) |
No paper trail (retrofit $475/ES&S machine). Allegations of vote errors nationally (ES&S). Dover 2004 race "re-run" January due to machine errors.
(cite1,
cite2,
cite3,
cite4) |
| RI |
Optical Scan (ES&S)
|
(cite) |
| SC |
DRE (Danaher Controls, ES&S)
and
Optical Scan (ES&S)
|
(cite) |
| SD |
Optical Scan (ES&S) |
(cite) |
| TN |
DRE (ES&S, MicroVote)
and
Optical Scan (Diebold)
|
(cite) |
| TX |
DRE (Automark - est $5,200 pm ; Diebold; ES&S; Hart InterCivic) and
Optical Scan (ES&S)
|
Paper trail.
(cite1, cite2) |
| VA |
DRE (AVS, Diebold, ES&S, Sequoia, Unilect)
and
Optical Scan (AVS, Diebold, Hart Intercivic, Sequoia) |
(cite1,
cite2) |
| UT |
|
Paper trail required. (cite1,
cite2) |
| VT |
Optical Scan (Diebold) |
Paper trail required. (cite1,
cite2)
|
| WA |
DRE (Sequoia and Hart InterCivic)
and Optical Scan (Diebold) |
Paper trail required effective 1 Jan 06.
King County (Seattle) proposes 100% mail ballots;
Snohomish County (Everett) considers 100% mail ballots.
Allegations of vote errors in Snohomish County (Sequoia - 2004).
(cite1,
cite2,
cite3)
|
| WI |
DRE (ES&S) and
Optical Scan (Diebold)
|
(cite) |
| W VA |
DRE (ES&S)
and
Optical Scan (ES&S)
|
Paper trail required. Audit of sample votes each election cycle. (cite1,
cite2,
cite3)
|
| WY |
DRE (Danaher Controls) and
Optical Scan (Diebold, ES&S) |
(cite) |
![]()
|
